Suggestion[]
I suggest that the current content of this article be moved to "Saber (Class)", while moving "Saber (Fate/stay night)" over here. The main reason is I believe a significant larger number of people interested in "Saber" is looking for the character, not the class. Thus the character should get the main use of the "Saber" pagename. The character page would then have a note on the top saying "This article is about the Saber who appeared in Fate/stay night. For the Saber Servant class, see Saber (Class)." -Afker All hail AliceSoft! 01:52, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
- I agree that large majority of people looking for "Saber" are looking for Arturia rather than the class. Usually I'd be against this move as there are naming conventions for all Servant articles (having (Fate/stay night) or (Fate/Zero) in title), but I think Saber can be an exception, like Gilgamesh, as she appears in both 4th and 5th Grail War. --Azaghal 15:44, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
- I'm against it, since even the name "Saber" is inherited from her class. I say the exception should be made instead for putting a "This article is about a Servant class. For the <descriptive term>, see..." --Raijinili 16:30, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- I second the above. All classes should work on the same structure, as with what Azaghal says about everyone just having "(fate/stay night)" or "(fate/zero)" stuck at the end of the page name ; this and the "for the FSN heroine, see saber (fate/stay night)" should be more than enough. Gilgamesh is more of an exception to exceptions, because he's actually usually referred to by his actual name and not by his class, so Saber's case can't be compared. --Byakko 20:36, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
- I'm against it, since even the name "Saber" is inherited from her class. I say the exception should be made instead for putting a "This article is about a Servant class. For the <descriptive term>, see..." --Raijinili 16:30, 25 January 2009 (UTC)